When LLMs can draft physics papers, what is the right authorship practice?
MvsCerezo · x · 2026-07-25
The author asks what the proper practice is when LLMs can already produce convincing physics papers.
They propose a workflow of reviewing the proof, signing their name, disclosing that the paper was AI-generated, and publishing it on arXiv — and ask whether that is considered acceptable practice.
More from Research
- Conference slide warns AI optimization could pull mathematics’ goals apart — AlexKontorovich · 2026-07-25
- Goodhart’s law makes generative-AI metrics especially easy to game, slide says — AlexKontorovich · 2026-07-25
- Avatar 3 Fire FX Revealed: Engine Driven by Real Chemistry & AI — carlosdponx · 2026-07-25
- Tao’s ICM 2026 hypothesis: AI may soon handle a meaningful share of research math — AlexKontorovich · 2026-07-25
- ICM slide says most AI capability claims lack controlled scientific evidence — AlexKontorovich · 2026-07-25
- Evidence suggests some models may be imitating Claude in public chats — dfrsrchtwts · 2026-07-25