Miles Brundage says one case was wrong, but AI safety remains a neglected industry problem
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-07-25
Miles Brundage says he was corrected on one case, but believes the broader issue is still real.
- In the quoted thread, he argues that relying on manual handling for sensitive AI-related tasks is not just an edge case.
- He says the same pattern likely exists across multiple companies.
- His broader warning is that the industry has neglected a serious, long-running safety problem: AI systems are getting more capable faster than organizations are adapting their safety practices.
Related event: Ex-Researcher Says Anthropic Chart Controversy Stems from Overtrust in AI(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus says China has mostly caught up in AI, especially on price — bookwormengr · 2026-07-25
- An AI reviewer may already beat most NeurIPS reviews, says VitalyFM — vitalyFM · 2026-07-25
- Third-party labs are needed to verify frontier AI safety claims — teortaxesTex · 2026-07-25
- Miles Brundage warns that the AI industry has a growing over-trust problem — Miles_Brundage · 2026-07-25
- MIT Sloan says AI can expand worker capability, not just automate jobs — Exp_Mark · 2026-07-25
- A Reddit post warns that unfiltered AI may be moving faster than society can absorb it — DoctorHoliday3942 · 2026-07-25