Miles Brundage says one case was wrong, but AI safety remains a neglected industry problem
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-07-25
Miles Brundage says he was corrected on one case, but believes the broader issue is still real.
- In the quoted thread, he argues that relying on manual handling for sensitive AI-related tasks is not just an edge case.
- He says the same pattern likely exists across multiple companies.
- His broader warning is that the industry has neglected a serious, long-running safety problem: AI systems are getting more capable faster than organizations are adapting their safety practices.
Related event: Ex-Researcher Says Anthropic Chart Controversy Stems from Overtrust in AI(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic Insiders: Not Everyone at the Lab Believes in High p(doom) — anpaure · 2026-09-11
- Could 10k agents discover learning methods beyond backprop, or just tweak existing ones? — SeunghyunSEO7 · 2026-09-11
- AI companionship dissolves the friction real intimacy needs, warns long-form thread — YogeshMalik · 2026-09-11
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- 'Hallucination' Is a Category Error: Naming AI 'Intelligence' Limits Our Imagination — Genaforvena · 2026-09-11
- Data engineering, not agent frameworks, is the real bottleneck for enterprise AI agents — dhruv2038 · 2026-09-11