Miles Brundage says one case was wrong, but AI safety remains a neglected industry problem
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-07-25
Miles Brundage says he was corrected on one case, but believes the broader issue is still real.
- In the quoted thread, he argues that relying on manual handling for sensitive AI-related tasks is not just an edge case.
- He says the same pattern likely exists across multiple companies.
- His broader warning is that the industry has neglected a serious, long-running safety problem: AI systems are getting more capable faster than organizations are adapting their safety practices.
Related event: Ex-Researcher Says Anthropic Chart Controversy Stems from Overtrust in AI(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Musk: robot RAM demand will dwarf everything else, and 100% of superintelligence compute goes to deep space — elonmusk · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic S-1 warns of AI job displacement as Microsoft offers exit to ~27% of staff — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-10-27
- eigenrobot: 200 years of attempts to replace Christianity have each fared worse than the last — eigenrobot · 2026-10-27
- Replit CEO on the 'self-driving company': agents to absorb coordination costs by 2030 — amasad · 2026-10-27
- US senator slams AI industry for proposing 50-death threshold for 'catastrophic incident' — peterwildeford · 2026-10-27
- Replit CEO Says AI Makes All Software De Facto Open Source; Aakash Gupta Asks What Moats Remain — aakashgupta · 2026-10-27