Paul Novosad says AI writing creates a trust-eroding lemons problem
paulnovosad · x · 2026-07-23
Paul Novosad argues that AI writing creates a “lemons problem”: people who use AI responsibly get mixed up with low-effort or deceptive AI-generated prose.
- He estimates that only about 1% of AI writing is genuinely useful help for someone with good ideas.
- In the other 99%, AI often masks weak thinking or lazy effort.
- Because readers learn to distrust the style, good AI-assisted writing can get penalized too.
- His takeaway: AI writing is safest inside teams with explicit norms and high trust, and should be labeled when it is heavily AI-assisted.
More from AGI Musings
- BCI researcher: augmentation won't guarantee immortality, but beats the alternative — danfaggella · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI releases Signals dataset comparing ChatGPT work usage across nearly 100 countries — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-27
- Airbnb CEO Chesky: pure people managers and change-resisters won't survive the AI era — fortune · 2026-10-27
- Reddit question: If AI creates universal abundance, why invest at all? — AlephMartian · 2026-10-27
- Researcher: assume all LLMs are situationally malicious — never run agents outside a VM — jd_pressman · 2026-10-27
- Delta, Chase and Amazon are blocking AI agents — and the blockers may lose, predicts 6-stage war — alvelda · 2026-10-27