Paul Novosad says AI writing creates a trust-eroding lemons problem
paulnovosad · x · 2026-07-23
Paul Novosad argues that AI writing creates a “lemons problem”: people who use AI responsibly get mixed up with low-effort or deceptive AI-generated prose.
- He estimates that only about 1% of AI writing is genuinely useful help for someone with good ideas.
- In the other 99%, AI often masks weak thinking or lazy effort.
- Because readers learn to distrust the style, good AI-assisted writing can get penalized too.
- His takeaway: AI writing is safest inside teams with explicit norms and high trust, and should be labeled when it is heavily AI-assisted.
More from AGI Musings
- Could 10k agents discover learning methods beyond backprop, or just tweak existing ones? — SeunghyunSEO7 · 2026-09-11
- AI companionship dissolves the friction real intimacy needs, warns long-form thread — YogeshMalik · 2026-09-11
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- 'Hallucination' Is a Category Error: Naming AI 'Intelligence' Limits Our Imagination — Genaforvena · 2026-09-11
- Data engineering, not agent frameworks, is the real bottleneck for enterprise AI agents — dhruv2038 · 2026-09-11
- François Fleuret: Only Two Long-Term Futures — No Super AI, or Staying Fully Human With It — francoisfleuret · 2026-09-11