Open-source debates blur code access with the real job of keeping projects secure
mmitchell_ai · x · 2026-07-23
The thread argues that if people believe organizations should not be able to defend themselves unless they depend on a company they may strongly disagree with, that creates stalemates over what is acceptable.
A reply then clarifies a common confusion in open-source debates:
- “Anyone can push code” is not how open source works.
- The real model is that registered users can submit code for review and consideration.
- It also distinguishes open source in general from an open-source company responsible for keeping code fresh and secure.
Related event: After Cyber Incident, Mitchell Reaffirms Open Models Are Key to Defense(10 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- Anthropic Insiders: Not Everyone at the Lab Believes in High p(doom) — anpaure · 2026-09-11
- Lumara AI Film Festival Comes to NYC Oct 26, Top AI Filmmakers to Compete — 0xAllen_ · 2026-09-11
- X drama: Anthropic researchers accused of spying on academic customers and racing them to results — basedjensen · 2026-09-11
- Investor argues Palantir-Nvidia partnership should slash Anthropic's IPO valuation — pdamodaran · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- PyTorch Day Korea 2026 launches first offline conf, CFP closes Sept 13 — PyTorch · 2026-09-11