Open-source rhetoric often confuses code submission with real maintenance and security
mmitchell_ai · x · 2026-07-23
This reply expands the point that “open source” rhetoric often mixes up two different things: whether registered users can submit code for review, and whether code is truly open to unrestricted pushes.
The core claim is that an open-source company can employ security experts, maintain guardrails, and keep the codebase fresh, whereas a lone maintainer cannot provide the same level of operational security.
Related event: Expert Advocates Company-backed Open Source for AI Security(10 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- Post says the U.S. led open models first, then let closed models take over — cocktailpeanut · 2026-07-23
- For enterprise AI agents, the first question is ownership and governance, not Copilot Studio vs. Foundry — WirelessLife · 2026-07-23
- WAIC speaker says world models are gaining real momentum in China — smtabatabaie · 2026-07-23
- User criticizes Anthropic strategy: RLHF unbearable, Chinese models more practical — StewartalsopIII · 2026-07-23
- AI-culture joke says you now have to LARP to succeed — KadriJibraan · 2026-07-23
- NERC robotics conference moves to Princeton with papers, demos, and Rising Stars — tomssilver · 2026-07-23