Critics say OpenAI’s silence on GPT-OSS is making open models less safe
BlancheMinerva · x · 2026-07-22
- The post argues that OpenAI’s refusal to explain what it did with GPT-OSS is a dangerous choice.
- It cites a quoted discussion claiming GPT-OSS is hard to un-align, and that some HF models stripped of safety training perform poorly.
- The core issue is the tension between openness, safety training, and how easily safety work can be undone in large models.
Related event: GPT-OSS Open-Source Debate: Risk Assessment vs. Regulation(22 posts)→
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11