Peer review should not receive AI-generated vibe reports, the thread argues
fredahshi · x · 2026-07-22
The post argues that vibe reports produced by coding agents are meant for the author’s own reading and analysis, not for sharing with peer reviewers or the scientific community. In the reply, the author says submitting a vibe report with very few complete sentences should count as research misconduct because it wastes everyone’s time.
More from coding & agent
- ThoughtSpot launches SpotterCode, a hosted MCP server letting Claude Code query live instances — thoughtspotdev · 2026-10-26
- Non-developer stuck at 65% with Claude Code: rules files and CLAUDE.md weren't enough — jinguh · 2026-10-26
- HermesOBD: open-source macOS app pipes live car OBD-II data to a local Hermes agent — Teknium · 2026-10-26
- User Claims Codex Autonomously Reverse-Engineered Serum2 and Stripped Its License — Kyrannio · 2026-10-26
- colab-mcp lets AI agents control Google Colab notebooks directly — helloiamleonie · 2026-10-26
- Postiz, an open-source AI-agent social media manager, hits 37.9k GitHub stars — abhishek__AI · 2026-10-26