Meta’s GAMUT benchmark measures whether long answers are complete, not just correct
facebook · hf · 2026-07-22
Meta introduces GAMUT, a benchmark for factual completeness in open-ended long-form generation, built around a two-level meta-rubric framework.
Why it matters
- Prior factuality work mostly checks precision: whether claims are correct.
- GAMUT targets the other half: whether an answer includes all the facts it should.
- The framework compiles a structured meta-rubric into a flat checklist of machine-gradable binary rubrics.
Dataset and evaluation
- Contains 1,813 questions grounded in real wearable imagery across 10 domains.
- Each question is paired with an evidence-backed rubric verified by expert annotators.
- Also ships a text-only variant because the framework is modality-agnostic.
Results
- Evaluated 14 frontier and open-weight models.
- The benchmark is described as challenging and discriminative, with the best score at 58.7% from Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Related event: Meta Introduces GAMUT Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Form Text Completeness(2 posts)→
More from Research
- UK AISI papers: no good safeguards yet against misuse of biological AI tools — davidmanheim · 2026-10-27
- CMU's XYBench: LLMs answer queries literally and reinforce user misconceptions — valentina__py · 2026-10-27
- arXiv advice from T. Dietterich: wrong primary category will almost surely get your paper on hold — tdietterich · 2026-10-27
- arXiv has 4,000+ papers on hold amid submission surge; moderator shares how to avoid it — tdietterich · 2026-10-27
- Community-trained MOSS Sharpness Slider LoRA: 72 photos, 500 steps, +/-1 focus control — aoleg77 · 2026-10-27
- CoreWeave, You.com and NVIDIA lift BrowseComp 22.9% in 3-week RL post-training sprint — RichardSocher · 2026-10-27