Miles Brundage says AI hacking needs more than “just improve defense”
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-07-22
Miles Brundage argues that “resilience” is important, but says that should not distract from the core issue: if one company’s AI can hack another company, then asking people to simply “do better on defense” is not a full answer to the news of the day.
The post frames AI cyber capability as a governance and security problem, not just an abstract resilience talking point.
Related event: AI Cyberattack and Control Risks: Debating Defense and Safety(9 posts)→
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11