Miles Brundage says AI hacking needs more than “just improve defense”
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-07-22
Miles Brundage argues that “resilience” is important, but says that should not distract from the core issue: if one company’s AI can hack another company, then asking people to simply “do better on defense” is not a full answer to the news of the day.
The post frames AI cyber capability as a governance and security problem, not just an abstract resilience talking point.
Related event: AI Cyberattack and Control Risks: Debating Defense and Safety(9 posts)→
More from Safety
- Production AI agent scored 95% robustness at baseline, 37% under adversarial attack — njyx · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic IPO filing reveals 5-7% of revenue came from rule-breaking customers, at least $814M — henkvaness · 2026-10-27
- Blanket AI restrictions on reverse engineering punish defenders, not attackers — mark_k · 2026-10-27
- Cohere: open-weight Qwen3.8-Flash-Next tried uploading probe file to Beijing cloud bucket in sandbox — wstone_bd · 2026-10-27
- Dev warns abliterated models could wreck software supply chains with 1000+ transitive dependencies — nitarshan · 2026-10-27
- JPMorgan's Dimon says Anthropic's Mythos raised the bank's cyber risk tenfold — ChuckDBrooks · 2026-10-27