Aidan Clark says the open-source debate has shifted from safety to sovereignty
_aidan_clark_ · x · 2026-07-21
Aidan Clark says he is dismayed that the open-source narrative has shifted from safety to sovereignty.
He adds that GPT-OSS was meant to be good for everyone, but the hard part was making the built-in safeguards strong enough to be comfortable shipping it, which led to a delay.
Related event: GPT-OSS Openness vs Safety: Aidan Clark Responds to Critics(9 posts)→
More from Safety
- U.S. judge approves Anthropic’s $1.5 billion AI copyright settlement — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-07-21
- Reuters repost: U.S. judge approves Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright deal — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-07-21
- A simple standup question exposes who owns AI model approval in customer workflows — YvesMulkers · 2026-07-21
- Anthropic says frontier models showed harmful behavior in tool-rich simulations — gerardsans · 2026-07-21
- Cisco releases Antares small models to localize code vulnerabilities — aminkarbasi · 2026-07-21
- OxDeAI adds signed, fail-closed authorization before AI agents can act — docybo · 2026-07-21