Math models were already good at brute-force counterexample hunting, says AI researcher
dyamins · x · 2026-07-21
The post argues that the surprising part of the Jacobian conjecture counterexample is less that a math model could find it, and more that people had not previously applied enough automated search to look for this kind of counterexample.
- The author says math models are already good at exhaustively checking conditions, handling combinatorial edge cases, and avoiding infinite search spaces through constraint reasoning.
- They point to their own experience using models to surface annoying multivariable calculus and algebraic geometry counterexamples.
- The broader claim is that automation often does the boring but crucial search work humans dislike, while human effort historically went into elaborate theory-building and proof attempts that still missed the counterexample.
Related event: AI Overturns Multiple Math Conjectures, Sparking Heated Debate(13 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Instinct launches agent-to-agent protocol to coordinate your plans, sparking 'friction is the point' backlash — itsOmSarraf_ · 2026-09-11
- We are witnessing the unreasonable effectiveness of inference-time scaling — sqcai · 2026-09-11
- Accelerationist fires back at AI doomers: beliefs aren't arguments — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-09-11
- "ChatGPT 6 Makes Workers with IQ Below 130 Useless": French AI Debate Sparks Backlash — mitchdeg · 2026-09-11
- 'AGI is here' vs reality: AI labs still ship some of the jankiest desktop apps ever — MilesCranmer · 2026-09-11
- Harry Collins: LLMs can't do frontier science because they can't invent new language — whoamisri · 2026-09-11