Seedance 2.0 Tested on Robot Tasks
DJiafei · x · 2026-07-18
The author tested Seedance 2.0 on the same robotic task, costing $7 to generate.
Their conclusion: motion appears more realistic, and scene consistency has improved, though the overall difference isn't massive. The biggest shortcoming remains the mechanical hand/gripper, which exhibits strange repetitive opening and closing. The author speculates this is because such grippers are rare in online Franka datasets, causing the model to encounter an OOD (out-of-distribution) scenario.
Finally, they pose the question: is this performance "good enough" to be used for robot training?
More from Embodied
- Claude Code finds root backdoor in Honda Civic head unit, then debloats it — IndraVahan · 2026-10-26
- Temple health wearable opens pre-orders, users ask: why wear it before benefits are proven — abhishekcode42 · 2026-10-26
- FLASH: GPU-native deformable sim learns cloth folding in minutes on one RTX 5090 — ChongZzZhang · 2026-10-26
- Luke Wroblewski spots it: iPhone Duo's corner radius mirrors the original iPhone — LukeW · 2026-10-26
- Humanoids shattered forecasts: half-marathon record in 2026, 100m faster than Bolt — ben_j_todd · 2026-10-26
- Humanoid walking is continuous correction — watch recovery, not locomotion, in demos — Olivier__OG · 2026-10-26