Gary Marcus: Generative AI Is Terrible Engineering
GaryMarcus · x · 2026-07-15
Gary Marcus amplified an opinion piece arguing that "AI doesn't have to be built this way," calling the premise that "we are building AI wrong" mandatory reading.
The core arguments from the Atlantic article he cited include:
- Researchers note that generative AI scales incredibly inefficiently, making it hard to find comparable real-world software scaling behaviors.
- While traditional industries and software rely on economies of scale, generative AI might be "one of the worst-engineered technologies."
- The article doesn't simply oppose AI; it questions the engineering and economic sustainability of the current technological path.
Marcus uses the piece to reinforce his own stance: the current approach to generative AI suffers from structural flaws, not just short-term product experience issues.
Related event: Debate Flares Over The Atlantic’s Critique of Generative AI(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Michael Levin on AI Emails: Read the Papers First, Then Write Me — drmichaellevin · 2026-10-27
- Resy goes scorched earth on agent-based bookings; big agent platforms may force the issue — kevinakwok · 2026-10-27
- Professor's quip: the future of work is AI doing the job and humans updating résumés — prof_kamilov · 2026-10-27
- The most dangerous instruction you can give a superintelligent machine: lie to me — r0ck3t23 · 2026-10-27
- Aditya Agarwal: fear is a policy choice, and the biggest risk to American AI — adityaag · 2026-10-27
- The Best University of 2030 Will Have No Professors, Lectures or Exams, Says Predictions Post — nick_linck · 2026-10-27