Gary Marcus: Generative AI Is Terrible Engineering
GaryMarcus · x · 2026-07-15
Gary Marcus amplified an opinion piece arguing that "AI doesn't have to be built this way," calling the premise that "we are building AI wrong" mandatory reading.
The core arguments from the Atlantic article he cited include:
- Researchers note that generative AI scales incredibly inefficiently, making it hard to find comparable real-world software scaling behaviors.
- While traditional industries and software rely on economies of scale, generative AI might be "one of the worst-engineered technologies."
- The article doesn't simply oppose AI; it questions the engineering and economic sustainability of the current technological path.
Marcus uses the piece to reinforce his own stance: the current approach to generative AI suffers from structural flaws, not just short-term product experience issues.
Related event: Debate Flares Over The Atlantic’s Critique of Generative AI(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Mathematician Daniel Litt Launches Problem Repo to Track Human vs AI Progress: 15 Problems, 1 Solved — littmath · 2026-09-11
- Should AI models be taught morality? Breakout incidents expose missing ethical training — Pfungus_ · 2026-09-11
- SoftBank's Masayoshi Son predicts 100 trillion self-replicating AIs: "humans' era as top life form is ending" — Puzzleheaded-King584 · 2026-09-11
- We are witnessing the unreasonable effectiveness of inference-time scaling — sqcai · 2026-09-11
- The AlphaFold lesson: AI-solved math may mean fewer mathematicians needed — kiki-le-koala · 2026-09-11
- Accelerationist fires back at AI doomers: beliefs aren't arguments — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-09-11