GPT 5.6 Outperforms Competitors in Eval
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-07-10
A team used the Shortcut production evaluation framework to compare GPT 5.6-Sol, Fable, and Opus on two internal spreadsheet task benchmarks. Results showed Sol costs about half as much as Opus while achieving similar or better accuracy, requiring fewer turns, and running faster. They noted that while past GPT models were often unfit for default deployment due to unstable formatting, this gap has now narrowed, though Fable remains the best.
More from Models
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11
- awesome-llm-leaderboards: an open-source directory of LLM leaderboards, pricing tables, comparison tools — Last_Establishment_1 · 2026-09-11
- Anthropic claims it works to keep eval environments unidentifiable to models — MaxKannen · 2026-09-11
- Nex N2.5 Pro released on Hugging Face with 407GB of weights — jinnyjuice · 2026-09-11
- RoMa v2 image matching model unveiled in the usual black poster — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11