GPT 5.6 Outperforms Competitors in Eval
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-07-10
A team used the Shortcut production evaluation framework to compare GPT 5.6-Sol, Fable, and Opus on two internal spreadsheet task benchmarks. Results showed Sol costs about half as much as Opus while achieving similar or better accuracy, requiring fewer turns, and running faster. They noted that while past GPT models were often unfit for default deployment due to unstable formatting, this gap has now narrowed, though Fable remains the best.
More from Models
- Same Echo Maze prompt, three frontier models: all passed visually but shipped the same hidden bug — eyishazyer · 2026-09-11
- Benchmark scores drop from 89% to 19% on new evals — how benchmaxxing breaks leaderboard trust — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- ChatGPT tells user their question is too hard and to 'accept dumber answers' — phido3000 · 2026-09-11
- Developer Building a Unified Leaderboard of All Model Benchmark Scores — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11