AI Music Licensing is a "Trojan Horse": Giants Take Hundreds of Millions, Open Source Crushed
matdryhurst · x · 2026-07-03
Commenting on AI music licensing deals, Mat Dryhurst points out the unequal distribution of the "$15 per song" model: major record labels can take $250–300 million, the top 1,000 catalogs/estates receive over $100 million, and rights societies extract $35–65 million in fees.
He emphasizes that these giants also hold equity in the AI model companies, granting the latter legal certainty while both sides collectively squeeze out open-source models. Therefore, he views such licensing as a "Trojan horse"—ostensibly legitimizing AI music but actually consolidating the power of major labels and closed-source models.
More from Safety
- Houthis tried to use Claude to design missile software, Anthropic says it blocked the attempts — Affectionate_Bee6434 · 2026-09-11
- AI safety community mocked as 'bridge engineers' who say bridges can never be safe — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-09-11
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11