TMLR Review Practices Spark Public Debate After Author Criticism

A public dispute erupted over TMLR's review process after an author criticized an Action Editor's decision. Executive Editor Gautam Kamath recommended resolving such disputes privately via email, while other researchers argued the issues are not isolated cases and proposed publishing desk-rejected papers and using AI models to arbitrate review decisions.

2026-10-17 ~ 2026-10-17 · 4 related posts

• ML journal EIC responds to review disputes: email us before blasting the journal — thegautamkamath · 2026-10-17
• Researcher floats AI-adjudicated desk rejects and public AE identities — BlackHC · 2026-10-17
• TMLR journal row: critics say problems go beyond one bad experience, editors push back — avt_im · 2026-10-17
• Researcher publicly challenges TMLR review process, citing multiple cases — avt_im · 2026-10-17