TMLR journal row: critics say problems go beyond one bad experience, editors push back
avt_im · x · 2026-10-17
A public dispute over TMLR's editorial processes: Gautam Kamath argues disputes between action editors and authors are usually resolved by email first and urged against blasting the journal over one bad experience. avtim counters that this is neither an N=1 situation nor limited to 2026, offering further examples privately while affirming support for TMLR's mission.
Related event: TMLR Review Practices Spark Public Debate After Author Criticism(4 posts)→
More from Research
- DSReg post-hoc regularization provably recovers latents without reconstruction; Nature MI paper unifies superposition theory — ninamiolane · 2026-10-17
- VaeZip: open-source codec stores VAE latent datasets 5-10x smaller with near-zero quality loss — TensorForger · 2026-10-17
- SCALLOP paper at NeurIPS 2026 trains few-step flow maps with tractable likelihood for Boltzmann generation — gottapatchemall · 2026-10-17
- GPT-6 Astra nears 100% on Columbia's SRE-Bench reverse-engineering benchmark, others below 60% — banteg · 2026-10-17
- Survive or Collapse: data gating, not rewards, drives self-play RL collapse — shangbinfeng · 2026-10-17
- Goodfire's interpretability breakthrough splits OpenAI researchers' takes — burny_tech · 2026-10-17