Researcher publicly challenges TMLR review process, citing multiple cases
avt_im · x · 2026-10-17
A researcher publicly engaged with TMLR editor Gautam Kamath, praising the journal's mission while flagging concerns: he says the issues are "not an N=1 situation" nor limited to 2026, and that he holds more examples he'd share privately. He hopes the exchange helps sharpen the journal's processes, arguing ML itself needs more good venues.
Related event: TMLR Review Practices Spark Public Debate After Author Criticism(4 posts)→
More from Fun
- AWS unilaterally cancels Cloudflare's re:Invent booth; CEO taunts rival — irvinebroque · 2026-10-17
- Babylon Bee: Tiger Woods Unimpressed by Roadster Since He's Flipped Dozens of Cars — AICopyLab · 2026-10-17
- shadcn spots Claude doing 'retroactive edits' — striking through its earlier wrong answer — shadcn · 2026-10-17
- Creators fake early access to Tesla Roadster with Magnific-generated imagery, prompts included — techhalla · 2026-10-17
- Orange Tsai's HEXACON talk demos popping a browser from calc.exe, wowing security researchers — dyn___ · 2026-10-17
- repligate: model name choices likely correlate with Anthropic shibboleth usage — repligate · 2026-10-17