e/acc Founder Beff Jezos Launches All-Out Counterattack on AI Doomers
In mid-September 2023, e/acc (effective accelerationism) founder Beff Jezos (Extropic CEO Guillaume Verdon) posted intensively on X from 09-12 to 09-13, launching a full counterattack on the "AI Doomer" camp. His central thesis: spreading panic is itself the real danger, potentially greater than AI itself.
Confirmed
- Core statements: panic is the real danger and spreading fear is not a virtue (m2); doomers are "injecting cortisol into everyone, spreading their anxiety" (m8); sharing David Friedberg's interview, he called "decel psyop panic" the true threat to social welfare, noting panic-makers never pay for long-term damage and missed opportunities (m10).
- On 09-13 he posted a long piece alleging the week's anti-AI events were a coordinated PR operation, citing a timeline: a doomer post algorithmically boosted to 120M+ views, Democratic politicians amplifying AI fear the same day, mainstream media coverage, MIRI's Nate Soares on Tucker, UK regulators' joint letter, etc. (m1).
- Citing Martin Casado, he called a certain AI-safety-related release "the doomers' 9/11," implying premeditation (m7). He also endorsed Suzanne Scanziani's satire mocking doomers for assuming superintelligence can magically solve all physical constraints, with overnight foom violating physics (m9).
- Amplifying Ramez's open-source AI summit demo, he summarized: closed-source labs are coordinating mass media campaigns and lobbying politicians to stop open-source AI—"they don't want to compete in the free market"—a "manufacturing consent, centralizing power" movement (m11).
- He stated p(1984) far exceeds p(AI Doom), expressing alarm at the regulatory climate (m13).
- He targeted the AI safety ecosystem: "AI Safety is the new woke," accusing an AI-doomer NGO industrial complex of becoming a new DEI-style NGO industry (m6). Citing Kevin Bass, he said "AI safety means the opposite of what its advocates claim," mocking those who sell p(Doom) while guaranteeing p(1984)=1 (m4).
- In cruder posts, he mocked doomers as low-testosterone, weak, dependent on tribal authority and naturally anxious, joking that "testosterone in the water" would solve the AI doomer problem (m3).
- Sympathizers: MickeySteamboat cited Beff's "Doomer is the new woke" to accuse doomers of coordinating, even illegally, to slow AI (m14); a long anti-doomer essay criticized self-appointed AI guardians for packaging research delays as "prudence," power concentration as "safety," censorship as "risk reduction," while ignoring the measurable annual costs of stagnation (m5); another thread accused parts of the MIRI school of advocating authoritarian world government by a council of "super-rationalists" (m12).
Unconfirmed
- Claims of a "coordinated PR operation" and "closed-source labs coordinating media and lobbying" remain one-sided e/acc narratives based on timeline coincidences and motive inference, without direct evidence of organized coordination.
- The description of MIRI advocating authoritarian world government comes from secondhand commentary and may not accurately represent MIRI's positions.
Why it matters
This was a landmark exchange in the e/acc vs. AI-safety debate: one side invokes existential risk to justify slowdown and regulation; the other fires back citing stagnation costs, power concentration, and narrative manipulation. As the flagbearer of e/acc and CEO of Extropic, Beff's "p(1984) > p(doom)" framing and "AI Safety is the new woke" charge gave the anti-regulation camp punchy slogans, directly shaping the subsequent public debate over open vs. closed source and acceleration vs. safety.
2026-09-12 ~ 2026-09-13 · 14 related posts
- Episode 1: Debate Rages Over AI Doom Narratives and Control Agendas(2026-09-09, 11 posts)
- Episode 2: DeepMind Researcher Publicly Warns of AI Existential Risk, Sparking Debate(2026-09-10, 4 posts)
- Episode 3: e/acc Founder Beff Jezos Launches All-Out Counterattack on AI Doomers(2026-09-12, 14 posts)
- Episode 4: Beff Jezos Slams AI Safety Camp as Regulatory Capture Tool(2026-09-14, 2 posts)
- Episode 5: Twitter Debate Heats Up Over Superintelligence Risk Arguments(2026-09-20, 3 posts)
Primary sources
- Anti-doomer essay: self-appointed AI guardians dress coercion up as 'safety' — TinfoilTricorn · 2026-09-12
- MIRI-style AI safety views attacked: doomsday rhetoric framed as power grab — repligate · 2026-09-12
- e/acc Founder Beff Jezos Mocks "AI Doomer Physiognomy" in Debate Sparking Backlash — beffjezos · 2026-09-12
- [source] Beff Jezos: the panic itself is the real danger, spreading fear isn't virtuous — beffjezos · 2026-09-12
- e/acc camp accuses "doomers" of coordinated, law-breaking psyops to slow down AI — MickeySteamboat · 2026-09-12
- beffjezos torches AI safety crowd: peddling p(Doom), guaranteeing p(1984)=1 — beffjezos · 2026-09-12
- e/acc founder Beff Jezos: the Decel Psyop panic is the real danger — beffjezos · 2026-09-12
- e/acc's beffjezos calls Martin Casado's jab "AI Doomer 9/11" — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- [source] e/acc figure claims coordinated campaign to turn AI fear into regulatory capture — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- e/acc Figure Beff Jezos: 'AI Safety Is the New Woke' — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- [source] Extropic CEO Verdon: p(1984) far exceeds p(AI Doom) — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- e/acc figurehead Beff Jezos rails against doomers' 'cortisol spike' campaign — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- e/acc's Beff Jezos: AI safety media push is 'manufacturing consent for power concentration' — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- Beff Jezos Mocks AI Doomers: Overnight Foom Would Violate Laws of Physics — beffjezos · 2026-09-13