2027 prediction: hourly AI films rivaling $500M epics, and critics gamed by design
morqon · x · 2026-11-15
- A viral thread sketches 2027: every hour someone spends a couple thousand dollars generating a 2.5-hour "magnum opus" AI film, technically on par with pre-2023 $500M features, but narratively homogeneous — nobody ever said "no" in production, and many exist just to shill a shitcoin.
- The deeper problem: with output flooding in, how do you tell hidden geniuses from slop? The author notes AI film reviewers can be hacked by embedding elements AI graders love (quiet seams doing slow work, "truth-seeking" edgy iconography, ledgers), letting creators make a "Claude movie" to appease Claude critics.
- Takeaway: in the AI-media era, evaluation itself gets reverse-optimized, making genuine quality signals increasingly scarce.
More from AGI Musings
- Philosopher Jeff Sebo slams 'confused and shallow' take on AI moral status — connoraxiotes · 2026-11-15
- Rutger Bregman reverses stance: 'We need to stop the AI industry, including Anthropic, right now' — birchlse · 2026-11-15
- Epoch ECI Trend Fit: Anthropic's Latest Model Runs ~5 Months Ahead — peterwildeford · 2026-11-15
- Ex-Citizen Quant Head Dan Morillo: AI Outputs Consensus, Not Alpha — minhnguyen · 2026-11-15
- 104 job titles across 80 years: an interactive family tree of software roles from 'Computer' to 'Context Engineer' — bibryam · 2026-11-15
- LeCun's CoRL slide: 'If you are interested in human-level AI, don't work on LLMs' — Heavy-Ad9232 · 2026-11-15