15-round editing test: Seedream 5.5 holds scenes far better than GPT Image
kimmonismus · x · 2026-11-12
The author ran the same 15 sequential edits through GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst and Seedream 5.5, with each round building on the model's own previous output: red coat, brass lantern, new subtitle, then the moon became Earth, a burning sun, ice, copper and gold, until a watchmaker carries the sphere away.
Both kept the headline text intact, but by round 10 the GPT version had drifted orange and over-sharpened, while Seedream 5.5 still resembled the original room.
BytePlus sells Seedream at about $0.02 per image in its image packs — the author argues that price plus consistency is what makes it compelling for revision-heavy workflows.
More from Multimodal
- Open world model hallucinates GTA in real time, runs on an RTX 3060 — lucidml_lover · 2026-11-12
- Dev builds sketch-guessing app with new Gemini Decisions API, guesses terrible drawings — fofrAI · 2026-11-12
- Redditor achieves 60-second one-pass lip-sync with LTX 2.3 in ComfyUI without quality loss — nelsig · 2026-11-12
- Open-source ComfyUI loader runs MiniMax H3 video LoRAs with H3 Image — IntellectuallDeviant · 2026-11-12
- Fable 5.2 builds a playable FPS in 30 minutes; Scoble says distribution is the real bottleneck — Scobleizer · 2026-11-12
- Audio-first video workflow: Seed Audio 1.0 + SeeDance 2.5 vs native audio, compared — TomLikesRobots · 2026-11-12