Open CHI Reviews site archives real CHI peer reviews, crowdsourced from authors
IanArawjo · x · 2026-11-12
HCI researcher Ian Arawjo's Open CHI Reviews Repository is live ahead of its official launch. Citing ACM's peer review policy ("Authors are permitted to use and share the text of the reviews they receive"), it's an open, anonymized archive of CHI reviews crowdsourced from authors — 4 papers across 3 years so far, covering outcomes from Round-1 rejection to revise-and-resubmit acceptances, searchable by conference, year, track, outcome and keywords. He seeded it with reviews from his own papers.
More from Research
- SPoT generalizes out-of-distribution: models learn to flag unanswerable questions — polkirichenko · 2026-11-12
- SPoT paper "Self-Improving Training & Thinking" now on arXiv with blog and thread — polkirichenko · 2026-11-12
- SPoT results: +17.7pp safety across 5 benchmarks, +4.7pp math accuracy over RL — polkirichenko · 2026-11-12
- SPoT boosts calibration: AUROC 0.61 to 0.84 while learning to abstain — polkirichenko · 2026-11-12
- Meta researchers unveil SPoT post-thinking: +17.7pp safety, +4.7pp math accuracy over RL baseline — polkirichenko · 2026-11-12
- How SPoT jointly trains answer generation and self-judgment across training stages — polkirichenko · 2026-11-12