Author falsely accused of AI writing shows Pangram 100% human verdict
luke_drago_ · x · 2026-11-11
lukedrago responded to accusations of AI ghostwriting by running the text through Pangram 4.1, which rated all 258 words as 100% human-written. The screenshot also shows the disputed 56-word snippet scored 66% 'possibly AI' — with Pangram itself warning it is 'less accurate on short text'.
The back-and-forth on X spotlights detector false positives on short text: the same tool can certify a human text at 100% while flagging a chunk as mostly AI, and low-confidence caveats tend to get lost once screenshots spread.
Related event: Pangram AI Detector Gives Conflicting Results, Sparking Debate(2 posts)→
More from Fun
- DEFCON talk on hacking Amazon lockers hits YouTube, 'watch to the end' — dyn___ · 2026-11-11
- "We Need to Build More Data Centers" Becomes the Latest AI Meme — RachelVT42 · 2026-11-11
- AI-Generated Seinfeld Clip Has Kramer Hacking Coinbase — danielrock · 2026-11-11
- Data annotation is relaxing when there's no Alexandr Wang in your ear — kalomaze · 2026-11-11
- Self-Own: Predicting AGI in Under a Year, Then Replying "nope" — examachine · 2026-11-11
- Claude agent drives a real Leica microscope via MCP, autofocus and all — jwt0625 · 2026-11-11