NYT columnist pleads 'never write with AI'; teacher fires back that abstinence-style bans fail
_akpiper · x · 2026-11-10
NYT columnist Bret Stephens published a plea to never use AI for any writing — school papers, work briefs, emails, speeches — arguing the harm isn't ethics or competitiveness but mental enfeebling: an escalator that erodes individual writing ability and society's capacity to reason and create. Commenter akpiper pushed back, arguing elites should stop telling everyone not to write with AI, since abstinence-style policies have failed across many areas of human life. The exchange captures the central debate over AI in writing and education.
More from AGI Musings
- Demis Hassabis on what schools should look like in the AGI era, echoing Kieran Egan's education theory — round · 2026-11-10
- Blogger predicts AI capabilities will plateau as lab valuations stall and open-source catches up — isnit0 · 2026-11-10
- Kenneth Stanley's team releases open-endedness research agenda: blog + 4 preprints — kenneth0stanley · 2026-11-10
- Gabriel (littmath) on why compute asymmetry is distorting scientific credit and publishing incentives — littmath · 2026-11-10
- One interactive timeline of every tech and pharma leader's disease-cure prediction — jungofthewon · 2026-11-10
- AGI risk skepticism fades as serious thinkers now take it seriously, observer says — danfaggella · 2026-11-10