Andrew Gelman asks: can peer review survive unrestricted AI use by reviewers?
JessicaHullman · x · 2026-11-10
Andrew Gelman (StatModeling), one of the most influential voices in statistics, reshares the question of whether peer review can survive reviewers using AI without restrictions — a direct challenge to the quality and trust assumptions of academic publishing.
More from AGI Musings
- Demis Hassabis on what schools should look like in the AGI era, echoing Kieran Egan's education theory — round · 2026-11-10
- Blogger predicts AI capabilities will plateau as lab valuations stall and open-source catches up — isnit0 · 2026-11-10
- Kenneth Stanley's team releases open-endedness research agenda: blog + 4 preprints — kenneth0stanley · 2026-11-10
- Gabriel (littmath) on why compute asymmetry is distorting scientific credit and publishing incentives — littmath · 2026-11-10
- One interactive timeline of every tech and pharma leader's disease-cure prediction — jungofthewon · 2026-11-10
- AGI risk skepticism fades as serious thinkers now take it seriously, observer says — danfaggella · 2026-11-10