Gary Marcus: Is Anthropic's Bigger Risk Dangerous AI or a Post-IPO Crash?
GaryMarcus · x · 2026-11-10
AI critic Gary Marcus posed a pointed question on X: is Anthropic more likely to cause major societal harm by (a) developing truly dangerous AI, or (b) tanking after its IPO and dragging down the economy with it?
The post continues his long-running skepticism about frontier labs' safety commitments versus market hype, linking safety risk with valuation-bubble concerns.
More from AGI Musings
- Jest dev Christoph Nakazawa: managers who can't code won't survive the AI era — cnakazawa · 2026-11-10
- Anthropic's new model formalized Fermat's Last Theorem in 30 hours and built a bootable OS in 8 days — kevinnbass · 2026-11-10
- Takashi Ikegami demos android alter3 talking and gesturing at ECOGS 2026 — AnnaCiaunica · 2026-11-10
- Terence Tao says AI Navier–Stokes proof is correct but mathematicians 'learned almost nothing' — sudoraohacker · 2026-11-10
- Hot Take: Should AI Assistants Have Personalities or Stay Neutral Tools? — VraserX · 2026-11-10
- Expensive launch videos used to signal importance — AI killed that signal — isnit0 · 2026-11-10