Science editorial on "Indigenous Science and AI" sparks backlash; Kevin Bryan's eight rules to rebuild trust
Afinetheorem · x · 2026-11-10
Economist Kevin A. Bryan published "Eight Rules to Regain Public Trust in Academia," responding to controversy over editorials in Science/NEJM:
- The trigger: a Science piece arguing AI models are trained on "Western scientific datasets" with single-dimension knowledge framing, and that Lakota science comprises "matter, energy, relationality, and a unifying life force" where reductionist Western science has limited application. Researchers like Afinetheorem argue such editorials damage public perception of science.
- Bryan's core rules: (1) produce and teach useful knowledge; (2) be useful to all of society with epistemic humility; (3) attract talent from all backgrounds, no insider games; (4) research must be neutral and objective — "there is no 'Western science' or culturally-determined 'ways of knowing'"; (5+) hire, promote and cite based on knowledge (screenshots cut off at rule 4).
- The clash is essentially cultural relativism vs. universalism in science, now colliding with AI discourse.
More from AGI Musings
- 1985 Whole Earth Review cover: "Computers as Poison" mirrors today's AI debates — beffjezos · 2026-11-10
- A decade of Cambridge students now run FAR AI, METR, UK AISI and GovAI — S_OhEigeartaigh · 2026-11-10
- Comic argues AI scientists will write the next chapter of science, not humans — YogeshMalik · 2026-11-10
- "Alignment" is semantically overloaded — taboo the word to argue clearly — Sauers_ · 2026-11-10
- Creator vows to quit AI-generated content: 'AI really feels like AI, not human' — Abhishekcur · 2026-11-10
- doty clarifies the scaling debate: the point is against hardcoding human priors, not abandoning algorithms — dotey · 2026-11-10