"Alignment" is semantically overloaded — taboo the word to argue clearly
Sauers_ · x · 2026-11-10
nissaseru argues that "alignment" smears together a very broad stretch of semantic real-estate: two people using the term often don't mean the same thing, which is especially problematic in writing. The suggestion is to taboo the word in discussions and instead use phrasing that articulates your actual intent — a common rationalist technique for surfacing genuine disagreements behind contested terminology.
More from AGI Musings
- 1985 Whole Earth Review cover: "Computers as Poison" mirrors today's AI debates — beffjezos · 2026-11-10
- A decade of Cambridge students now run FAR AI, METR, UK AISI and GovAI — S_OhEigeartaigh · 2026-11-10
- Comic argues AI scientists will write the next chapter of science, not humans — YogeshMalik · 2026-11-10
- Creator vows to quit AI-generated content: 'AI really feels like AI, not human' — Abhishekcur · 2026-11-10
- doty clarifies the scaling debate: the point is against hardcoding human priors, not abandoning algorithms — dotey · 2026-11-10
- Type theory researcher tells critics who called verification research useless to admit they were wrong — amplifiedamp · 2026-11-10