ACM policy lets authors share anonymous reviews, no barrier to crowdsourcing
IanArawjo · x · 2026-11-08
Responding to skeptics, Ian Arawjo points out that ACM policy explicitly allows authors to freely share their papers' anonymized reviews, so crowdsourcing an open review database faces no institutional barrier—only community pride and outdated norms. This supplements his call to open up CHI reviewing and ban LLM-assisted reviewers.
More from AGI Musings
- The 'evolutionary mismatch' chart explaining why humanity will ignore AI warnings — sebpaquet · 2026-11-08
- The meta-question as agent swarms scale: can models beat gradient descent at its own game? — JensHonack · 2026-11-08
- "Don't pause AI for healthcare": Plinz argues AI can cut US healthcare costs — JHochderffer · 2026-11-08
- Richard Sutton to keynote RISEx 2026 on 'Robot Kindergarten': robots must learn online — RichardSSutton · 2026-11-08
- Critic says LeCun, Marcus, Sutton are active detractors of serious AGI discourse — danfaggella · 2026-11-08
- Long-time LLM tinkerer argues AI worldviews lean left across models since 2020 — Merzmensch · 2026-11-08