Critic says LeCun, Marcus, Sutton are active detractors of serious AGI discourse
danfaggella · x · 2026-11-08
Dan Faggella argues that Yann LeCun, Gary Marcus, and Richard Sutton—researchers he respects—have become active detractors of serious AGI discourse precisely when it's needed most. His claim: having had no hand in the LLM paradigm, they simultaneously frame LLM dangers as silly and banal (like six-fingered hands) while denying LLMs pose big-picture risks. The attached screenshots show Sutton's tweet that "brute force computation is not enough for intelligence" and Gary Marcus endorsing it, illustrating the stance Faggella is criticizing.
More from AGI Musings
- JEV Gets Its First Paper as Researchers Split on Research Merit vs Closed Business Model — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-08
- "Humans overfit to confirmation too" — a witty mode collapse analogy for AI slop debate — flowersslop · 2026-11-08
- bayeslord: Stop treating AI as a monolith — four distinct goals demand precise language — sebkrier · 2026-11-08
- AI doesn't change how unique your niche interests are, argues dev pixlpa — pixlpa · 2026-11-08
- Albert Gu: Bitter Lesson isn't 'just scale Transformers' — algorithmic innovation matters — sewon__min · 2026-11-08
- The 'evolutionary mismatch' chart explaining why humanity will ignore AI warnings — sebpaquet · 2026-11-08