Researchers argue the Bitter Lesson was misread: more compute makes algorithm choice more critical
DimitrisPapail · x · 2026-11-08
- MillionInt argues a whole generation of scientists got reward-hacked by misreading the Bitter Lesson and the brief era when scaling transformers did most of the legwork.
- Core claim: the more compute you pour into training, the more important your algorithm is — some algorithms scale, others don't, and much energy went into dead ends while entire scaling dimensions remain unexplored.
- @arohan adds this will upset young scientists who stopped developing their own insights believing scaling alone was sufficient, and felt defeated by the "Bitter Lesson."
More from AGI Musings
- Irony of the agent era: AI is pushing this creator back to pen and paper — dreamwieber · 2026-11-08
- Martin Casado: specialized approaches grow toward generality, not just get eaten by it — timigod · 2026-11-08
- Counter to the 'Nature already does RSI' argument: life's waves suggest humans are fleeting — danfaggella · 2026-11-08
- Reminder of the original slow/fast takeoff definitions from Vinge and Yudkowsky — sebkrier · 2026-11-08
- 'People are ahead of their skis': stalled AI revenue sparks stagnation-over-boom warning — abhiadesai · 2026-11-08
- AI capability growth as a tug of war: recursive self-improvement vs diminishing returns — CFGeek · 2026-11-08