Double-blind quirk, not a priority dispute: BlancheMinerva on paper novelty clash

BlancheMinerva · x · 2026-11-07

BlancheMinerva continues the argument that paper B doesn't genuinely reduce A's novelty: nobody on paper B thinks it was their idea, and B doesn't claim it was. In her view it's a quirk of double-blind review, not a real priority dispute.

Related event: ICLR reviewers question novelty after workshop paper's content surfaces in collaborators' arXiv preprint(9 posts)→

Original post →

More from Research

• Sophont CEO Tanishq Abraham on Holon-S1 cancer research model and healthcare world model — iScienceLuvr · 2026-11-07
• Anthropic study: AI could absorb 27-52% of researchers' time, median 38% across fields — emollick · 2026-11-07
• Nearly 30% of ICLR 2027 reviews mention "appendix", fueling AI-written review fears — nsaphra · 2026-11-07
• LLMs Edit Robot Policy Weights Directly: 2,048 Parameter Tweak Lifts Success from 68% to 88% — zhaoran_wang · 2026-11-07
• GTEx MCP Server gives AI assistants 25 tools to query genomics across 54 tissue types — modelcontextprotocol · 2026-11-07
• Stanford's Anshul Kundaje: ML conference peer review is broken and unfixable — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-07

Research channel →