Stanford's Anshul Kundaje: ML conference peer review is broken and unfixable
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-11-07
Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje argues the ML conference system and gatekeeping "peer review" keep collapsing and will only worsen, calling it fundamentally unfixable due to gatekeeping, coordinated submission waves, and one-time reviewing.
More from AGI Musings
- Has anyone notable from the Pause AI movement flipped? ChrisGPT asks why — ChrisGPT · 2026-11-07
- NYT: OpenAI breakthrough challenges the Exponential Time Hypothesis, shaking a CS tenet — fortnow · 2026-11-07
- DREADDs: a new drug modality that works in humans, with a clear path to AI-driven design — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-07
- Muse rolls out voice avatars as designers slam its 'cute' mascot for weaponizing empathy — joonasvirtanen · 2026-11-07
- Agent-native email will replace Gmail as the connective tissue for agentic commerce — signulll · 2026-11-07
- Anthropic study: AI could absorb 27-52% of researchers' time, median 38% across fields — emollick · 2026-11-07