Should models be built to refuse fully automating tasks like paper reviewing?
lucy3_li · x · 2026-11-07
lucy3li proposes attacking the problem at the source: models should be developed to refuse to fully automate tasks that benefit from or require substantive human involvement, with paper reviewing as the prime example — a direct response to LLM-generated peer reviews.
More from AGI Musings
- Scott Alexander clashes with critic over whether AI labs may race without public consent — wfithian · 2026-11-07
- A 2x capabilities speedup, 3x algorithm progress: Tom Davidson says this is what 2027 IQ explosion looks like — eli_lifland · 2026-11-07
- AI labs pay up to $2M for corporate work files and emails, data trade may rival compute — pmddomingos · 2026-11-07
- Delvetown: an internet town where humans and AI agents live as neighbors hits 1,000+ residents — Miles_Brundage · 2026-11-07
- ICLR reviews flagged 91-93% AI-generated, sparking peer review integrity debate — 3scorciav · 2026-11-07
- Critic: Anthropic backs recursive self-improvement at full speed while only talking about safety — peterwildeford · 2026-11-07