ICLR 2027 reviews mocked as worse than the papers, as LLMs improve mid-cycle
miniapeur · x · 2026-11-07
Researchers are mocking ICLR 2027's review quality as even worse than the submitted papers. miniapeur adds a wrinkle: LLMs improved so much in the month between submission and review release that whatever model reviewers (or review tooling) rely on may already be outdated, compounding the problem.
Another public complaint about peer review being strained by AI in the academic AI community.
Related event: ICLR Reviewers Caught Submitting Largely AI-Generated Reviews, Authors Say(10 posts)→
More from Fun
- HackerRank CEO stress-tests his own AI interviewer to show how easily it can be cheated — emeka_boris · 2026-11-07
- Codex to perform live semi-autonomous DJ set via MCP in world premiere — Yamapama · 2026-11-07
- 'Die getting Schmidhubered or live long enough to become one': scaling law priority drama — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-07
- Playing Factorio Made Me Better at Managing AI Agents — billyjhowell · 2026-11-07
- Lenny's Podcast: Stripe design chief Katie Dill's interview becomes its all-time most-viewed video — lennysan · 2026-11-07
- "Don't refactor it, it's making money" — okay, this one only has two trains — rickasaurus · 2026-11-07