Embodied AI's real question isn't System-1 vs System-2, but drawing capability boundaries
ZhidingYu · x · 2026-11-06
The author argues the System-1 vs System-2 debate in embodied AI misses the point: the real work ahead is deciding which capabilities fit System-1's parallel output and which require System-2's autocratic autoregressive output. The quoted comment notes their approach turns System-1 into executable visual planning that skips the text-planning detour, clearing both latency and executability bars.
More from Embodied
- AI2 Releases ToyBlocks, an Open Simulated Tabletop for Robot Learning Experiments — allen_ai · 2026-11-07
- Somnia Lab is building Model L, an intimacy-focused humanoid robot — 5SecondsNaVzdoX · 2026-11-07
- Scaling H2R workshop at CoRL 2026 unveils speakers, submissions due in 5 days — mangahomanga · 2026-11-07
- Jim Fan to keynote CoRL on Nov 9, teasing new robotics work — DrJimFan · 2026-11-07
- Hermes-Agent hacks Echo Show 5: screen is just a web page you can customize — alexcovo_eth · 2026-11-07
- RoboPapers to host author mixer at CoRL conference — chris_j_paxton · 2026-11-06