ICLR author gets three identical AI-generated reviews, suggests Claude as judge
nsaphra · x · 2026-11-06
A researcher reports receiving three identical, LLM-generated reviews at ICLR, arguing reviewers aren't even reading submissions and just paste Claude's suggestions as reviewer demands. He suggests dropping the pretense and officially using Claude as a judge instead, highlighting how saturated peer review has become with LLM-written reviews.
More from Research
- Free primer book derives math foundations from VAEs and diffusion to WGANs — kalyan_kpl · 2026-11-07
- Kenneth Stanley at ARC Prize summit: why open-endedness is essential to AGI but brutal to benchmark — GregKamradt · 2026-11-07
- GLASS preprint teaser: graph-led LLM-assisted scoring of open-ended responses without human coding — GolinoHudson · 2026-11-07
- LLMs can read and patch weights, but 20 fine-tuning steps erase the edits — kevinpl07 · 2026-11-07
- FlexiTac-Gen launches: AI-agent-assisted tool to design custom tactile sensors, accepted to CoRL 2026 — Haoyu_Xiong_ · 2026-11-07
- PolicyIK: NYU trains RL for inverse kinematics on a real arm, hitting 0.5mm median error — Lianhuiq · 2026-11-07