Anthropic accused of redacting key evidence; researchers say opaque RSI mechanics hinder oversight
Jsevillamol · x · 2026-11-06
The Atlantic's Jerusalem Demsas questioned why Anthropic, self-styled "good guys of AI," redacted evidence that third-party evaluators deemed important for the public. In response, AI safety community member justjoshinyou13 acknowledged the details may be genuinely sensitive, but argued that regulating RSI — or even knowing how to react to it — is impossible without understanding its mechanics, and called for better solutions soon.
Related event: AI Labs Accused of Redacting Key Safety Evidence(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic report's key estimates are "guesses" — framing hides massive uncertainty, researcher says — daveholtz · 2026-11-06
- What working on a frontier problem feels like, in one vivid sentence — fkasummer · 2026-11-06
- The biggest AI bottleneck is now communication about data centers, argues Matt Slotnick — matt_slotnick · 2026-11-06
- Systematic review: GenAI fosters or hinders critical thinking depending on how it's used — _akpiper · 2026-11-06
- The Agentic Framework Maps Onto Any Conscious Substrate, a 'Platonic Engine' — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-11-06
- Stranger uses open-source AI to model ALK resistance and design backup cancer drug for free — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-06