LLM peer review is here to stay, researchers say — but 'excuses to reject' era must end
examachine · x · 2026-11-06
In an exchange on X, @khademinori argues that LLM-assisted peer review is here to stay and hopes the community learns to use it productively. @examachine agrees but criticizes its obvious misuse — an era of using LLMs to "find excuses to reject papers" that ought to end.
Related event: LLM-Assisted Paper Review Is Here to Stay, Researchers Say(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI startup Town founder on surviving big labs: plan around customers, not OpenAI — KateClarkTweets · 2026-11-06
- Rohit Krishnan maps "AGI institutions" experiments: 11 strong matches, zero at national scale — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-11-06
- AI audit of 138 economics papers finds 2,035 errors, 69% of papers affected — panickssery · 2026-11-06
- Laude names first four Moonshot labs, $10M each for Stanford, Cornell, UCSF/Berkeley, UChicago — Diyi_Yang · 2026-11-06
- Stanford PhD JulieKallini on testing Chomsky: can LMs learn a language no human could? — ChrisGPotts · 2026-11-06
- Gary Marcus: fantasies of giant pots of gold drive the reckless superintelligence race — GaryMarcus · 2026-11-06