Researchers say LLM-wielding reviewers nitpick good papers, still hype bad ones
khademinori · x · 2026-11-06
A researcher complains that peer review has "gone mental": reviewers use LLMs to poke holes in otherwise solid papers while loudly endorsing mediocre ones as usual. The reply argues that, for better or worse, LLM-assisted review is here to stay, and hopes the community learns to use it productively.
Related event: LLM-Assisted Paper Review Is Here to Stay, Researchers Say(2 posts)→
More from Fun
- Pro-AI poster asks anti-AI critics: is a machine doing human painting 'slop'? — charis_ai · 2026-11-06
- AI Agents Placed 500 Uber Eats Orders That Resulted in Just 4 Trips — fkasummer · 2026-11-06
- OpenAI devrel star Tibo's reach collapses to a fifth as even colleagues tire of the constant hyping — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-06
- Mistral agent lead Thibault Sautiaux 'demoted'? His own reply: "I live in the basement now" — CtrlAltDwayne · 2026-11-06
- Florida deploys robot bunnies to lure invasive pythons that wiped out 99% of raccoons — IsForAt · 2026-11-06
- My favorite album of the year is made by a robot — dreamwieber · 2026-11-06