Why Critical Thinking Is So Hard to Teach: Cognitive Science Says It's Not a Generic Skill
floguo · x · 2026-11-04
A resurfaced classic essay by Daniel Willingham argues that decades of calls to teach critical thinking have largely failed, because it is not a transferable generic skill — thinking is intertwined with domain knowledge. Without background knowledge and practice, students can't actually "consider multiple perspectives." Facts and thinking must be taught together; there is no knowledge-free version of thinking.
- A 1983 report found 40% of 17-year-olds couldn't draw inferences from text; only one-fifth could write a persuasive essay.
- "Thinking like a scientist" vs "like a historian" are genuinely different — no universal thinking technique exists.
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus reviews 2025 AI predictions: 17/18 correct on scaling hitting a wall — GaryMarcus · 2026-11-04
- DeepSeek's Liang Wenfeng on why open source is survival, not charity, in the AI era — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-04
- Every's inaugural Thesis: 2027 conference asks what great human work looks like after automation — every · 2026-11-04
- Greg Kamradt: attribution analysis could tease out AI's per-person dollar gains — GregKamradt · 2026-11-04
- Gary Marcus Scores His AI Predictions 17/18 in Spat With Sabine Hossenfelder — GaryMarcus · 2026-11-04
- PhD Reflection: The Brain Isn't a GPU — Rest Is Part of Research — tw_killian · 2026-11-04