Pre-pretraining gains traced to embedding init: N(0,0.02) alone lifts perplexity 9%

LauraRuis · x · 2026-11-04

A preprint by researchers from Cohere, UCL AI Centre and MIT (Stern, Rocktäschel, Locatelli, Ruis) re-examines synthetic pre-pretraining (PPT) across three synthetic curricula (k-Dyck, NCA, declarative reference corpus) and 50B-token training runs. In compute-matched experiments PPT never beats pure natural-language training. A single change — initializing token embeddings from N(0,0.02) instead of N(0,1) — improved baseline validation perplexity by 9.0%, fully wiping out the 5.4% gain previously attributed to PPT on synthetic cellular automata. An alternative scheme improves both methods but narrows the gap, and giving the natural-language budget extra compute persists past 1B tokens while PPT gains disappear. The authors conclude synthetic PPT's benefits as a distinct stage are limited and such data should be reconsidered.

Related event: Study questions synthetic pre-pretraining: never beats natural data under compute parity(2 posts)→

Original post →

More from Research

Research channel →