MIT audit of GPT-6 weight editing: 0.016% of weights changed, MATH-500 jumps 7.9% to 48.1%

kevrussell · x · 2026-11-04

MIT CSAIL audited the files behind GPT-6's weight edit: it touches only 0.016% of weights, and their rebuild matched the released model byte for byte.

On results, MATH-500 rose from 7.90% to 48.10%, and truncated answers fell from 93.0% to 33.05%. What the files don't yet show is why it works — still an open question. Context: MIT CSAIL dubs this "Weight-Space Programming" — frontier LLMs reading, fixing and rewriting NN weights (GPT-6 edited small NNs like Qwen3.5-0.8B via interpretability tools or direct weight editing), suggesting LLMs may soon optimize weights natively at human or superhuman level.

Related event: MIT Paper Shows LLMs Editing Other Models' Weights Directly for Big Gains(108 posts)→

Original post →

More from Models

Models channel →