Security researcher: "no AI needed" breaches indict an industry stagnant for 20 years
chrisrohlf · x · 2026-11-04
Security researcher Chris Rohlf pushes back on the dunk that a compromise "didn't require AI": that's not a rebuttal of AI-driven offense, but an indictment of the security industry's lack of real progress over the past two decades.
More from AGI Musings
- SAIL AI Challenge opens final phase: turn rare disease diagnoses into treatment reports — zakkohane · 2026-11-04
- Startup pitches 'monitor your agents so devs don't commit AI crimes' — basedjensen · 2026-11-04
- Primordiant launches general-purpose robot scientists to run experiments at scale — ycombinator · 2026-11-04
- Even with a 1000x-smarter superintelligence, people will still scroll Reels — jaivin · 2026-11-04
- Terence Tao: "AIs are much better at cheating" and finding model exploits — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-11-04
- Pain vs suffering may decouple — and differ across species, argues author — JoshPurtell · 2026-11-04