DeepSeek V4.1 Pro "leak" debunked: one README typo, not a real model
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-11-01
teortaxesTex debunks the rumor that DeepSeek V4.1 Pro appeared in benchmark setups: Renmin University's FlashRSI English README does mention deepseek-v4.1-pro in its Quick Start example (since Oct 31), but nowhere else. The project's actual SearchQA configs use v4-flash and v4-pro, and deepseek-v4.1-flash isn't even a valid model ID. Verdict: likely a typo/noise, not evidence of an unreleased model.
Related event: DeepSeek V4.1 sighting debunked as placeholder noise in FlashRSI docs(2 posts)→
More from Models
- DeepSeek v4.1-flash not secretly updated: API fingerprint unchanged since Oct 27 — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-01
- 'Claudese' is back: side-by-side screenshot shows Claude's signature prose style returning — oyacaro · 2026-11-01
- Same model, 17 points apart: OpenCode hits 82% on 21 MCP servers vs Claude Code's 65% — alejxb · 2026-11-01
- Commenter: if GPT-6.2 can't beat Opus 5.5, OpenAI faces a long road back — CtrlAltDwayne · 2026-11-01
- DeepSeek quietly drops autonomous coding agent prototype, Bloomberg picks it up instantly — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-01
- Reddit user calls out OpenAI's opaque compute metering: 'a generous amount of compute' is a marketing adjective — YouHadTooMuchToThink · 2026-11-01