AI-Generated Mega-PRs vs Small Commits: Hours-Long Test Suites Block Review
jmschreiber91 · x · 2026-10-30
Developer jmschreiber91 raises a concrete process question about AI-generated performance PRs: is it always better to split into dozens of small PRs, or submit a batch of improvements that reviewers can mine? He notes the test suite takes hours to evaluate, making per-PR runs costly, and asks for concrete suggestions on making the workflow more human-first.
More from coding & agent
- This Creator Runs His Entire X Content Loop With 6 Agents on Grok and Typefully — VibeMarketer_ · 2026-10-30
- Weaviate: Use Slow-Query Log and Profiling to Fix Slow Hybrid Search Queries — CShorten30 · 2026-10-30
- Open Duet: Open-Source Self-Hosted Rival to Claude Duet Hits 6.3k GitHub Stars — matchaman11 · 2026-10-30
- OpenClaw's Trail of Bits audit confirms 23 vulnerabilities, all fixed — steipete · 2026-10-30
- Supabase hits 13M users as ~70% of new activity comes from AI agents — ycombinator · 2026-10-30
- Zero evals is fine at first: nail UX, then build evals with domain experts — Al_Grigor · 2026-10-30