Don't Run Sequential Workloads on LLMs — Have Them Write Cheap CPU Code Instead
cis_female · x · 2026-10-30
- A discussion on LLM compute economics: sequential, branchy, long workloads run poorly on LLM inference — even with high MFU it's inefficient; CPUs are the right tool.
- The counterpoint adds a neat twist: the correct way to use an LLM here is not to run the workload on it, but to have the LLM write code that executes cheaply on a CPU — the model generates the program, the CPU runs it.
- A simple but memorable division of labor: models are good at writing code, not at being general-purpose processors.
More from coding & agent
- Hermes inbox: one command to see everything your agent is doing in the background — Teknium · 2026-10-30
- Databricks VP: Claude Code is just the start, AI software factories need a new agent-native infrastructure — FinanceYF5 · 2026-10-30
- AgentWeb lets AI agents skip browsers: 47/47 live site tasks, 1.9s median, $3 total — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-30
- Theorem Provers vs Specification Languages: How to Pick Between Lean, TLA+, P and More — burny_tech · 2026-10-30
- Dev built a Spotify-style self-hosted music app with Claude in 6 months, replacing Lidarr and the arrs — CoderLuii · 2026-10-30
- PersonaCUABench shows computer-use agents fail real user personas across 74 tasks — Haoming Li · 2026-10-30