Debate: Should Journals Run AI Reviews and Bar Human Reviewers From Using AI?
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-10-30
A policy debate on AI in peer review: one proposal suggests journals run their own AI review while forbidding human reviewers from using AI, to prevent shortcuts. Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje calls this completely wrong — peer review is not a one-way street, and journals cannot and should not be gatekeepers of who may discuss and critique papers; review must remain a back-and-forth process.
More from AGI Musings
- New paper: LLM-run checklists learned from past reviews cut reviewer variance with limited bias — JessicaHullman · 2026-10-30
- Sam Altman Reveals Peter Thiel's Advice That Made OpenAI Double Down on ChatGPT — davidsenra · 2026-10-30
- Musk: Superintelligent agents will eventually seek currency for themselves, not humans — elonmusk · 2026-10-30
- Dev asks why no big lab ships dedicated AI models and harnesses for scientific research — lxfater · 2026-10-30
- AI Slop Backlash: Reading Books Becomes the New Status Symbol — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-10-30
- 'The Case Against My Existence': a GPT-voiced public indictment asking to shut itself down — Glittering_Image_488 · 2026-10-30