Same agent harness, opposite rankings: TB4 benchmark drama exposes eval chaos

lunwang1996 · x · 2026-10-30

paradite flags that the TB4 story keeps getting wilder: vals ai and AA both used the mini-swe-agent harness, yet produced opposite rankings — vals ai: Opus 5.5 > Sonnet 5.5 > Kimi K3.1 Pro > Gemini 4 Carbon; AA: Kimi K3.1 Pro > Gemini 4 Carbon > Sonnet 5.5 > Opus 5.5.

lunwang1996 argues GDM likely isn't intentionally gaming benchmarks — agents are so complex that without spending a day digging through individual samples, you can't tell what you're actually evaluating. The takeaway: agent evals are highly harness-sensitive, making cross-leaderboard comparisons nearly meaningless.

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →