Would you trust a proof no human has fully understood?
rand_longevity · x · 2026-10-29
randlongevity poses a discussion-starting question: do you trust a proof that no human has fully understood? Touches on trust and verifiability in AI-assisted mathematics.
More from AGI Musings
- Frontier math will feel like frontier physics as AI advances, argues thread — akbirthko · 2026-10-29
- "We wrote the whole inference engine by hand — one year ago" — Yuchenj_UW · 2026-10-29
- The 'slop' debate: low-effort content predates AI — intent is the real test — AIandDesign · 2026-10-29
- The Unsettling Case: The Economy Keeps Running While It Stops Needing People — sebpaquet · 2026-10-29
- Decade-long engineer: AI adoption at work has become a token-burning leaderboard — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-10-29
- HF AI report spun as existential warning; Yacine counters software isn't solved — akbirthko · 2026-10-29